<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barron&#8217;s Article on Tech IPO&#8217;s Misses the Importance of the Extinct Sub-$50 million IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html</link>
	<description>thoughtful commentary on venture capital, innovation, and public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:43:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meier</title>
		<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/comment-page-1#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pascalsview.com/?p=738#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>Great post and timely find for us.  We are a solar startup trying to get our investors past fear of the future in exits.  Capital efficient build to cash flow positive is our plan, but that doesn&#039;t solve the problem of how they get their return.  The model is broken and a fix is hard to find.  Thanks for the analysis </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and timely find for us.  We are a solar startup trying to get our investors past fear of the future in exits.  Capital efficient build to cash flow positive is our plan, but that doesn&#039;t solve the problem of how they get their return.  The model is broken and a fix is hard to find.  Thanks for the analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/comment-page-1#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pascalsview.com/?p=738#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest!

Pascal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest!</p>
<p>Pascal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/comment-page-1#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pascalsview.com/?p=738#comment-973</guid>
		<description>At least this week&#039;s Barron&#039;s profiles JMP and their efforts to position themselves as a firm that embraces sub $50 million IPOs. 
 
The bigger is better (and too big to fail) business plan is NOT in our country&#039;s best interest.   
 
I enjoy your blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least this week&#039;s Barron&#039;s profiles JMP and their efforts to position themselves as a firm that embraces sub $50 million IPOs. </p>
<p>The bigger is better (and too big to fail) business plan is NOT in our country&#039;s best interest.   </p>
<p>I enjoy your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Derbinshire</title>
		<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/comment-page-1#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Derbinshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pascalsview.com/?p=738#comment-938</guid>
		<description>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts.  Keep up the good work.  I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader.  Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.pascalsview.com/pascalsview/2009/08/barrons-article-on-tech-ipos-misses-the-importance-of-the-extinct-sub-50-million-ipo.html/comment-page-1#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pascalsview.com/?p=738#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.

Allen Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.</p>
<p>Allen Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
